A translation is a dialogue, they say, but before engaging in the dialogue, you must be able to listen. Translation means being able to rely on someone else’s words, almost always a stranger’s, and to fully comprehend them down to the most minute and insignificant details, by tracing the oscillations in the mannerisms, the stylistic habits and favorite turns of phrase, which hold the true message of a text. Translating means being able to allow one’s own voice to merge with another, to let someone use it, and thereby have it sound as pure as possible, so that it overlaps with the author’s in a natural and uninhibited way, while making the best of both its strong and weak sides, of the linguistic obstacles and the undaunted choice of words. If all goes well, it also means falling in love with the translated text and providing an active role for it in a genuine and passionate dialogue with the author.
So this is what I think of when I think of translation. If I reflect on it in abstract terms and with philosophical concepts, it always seems to me the most profound and respectful means of making acquaintance with something different. As if the mediating role of a written text assists in taking a step back and hence creating distance to the object of study, which is required in order to focus on it and to see it as a whole. It is as if simply placing a text between two people would give them the opportunity for a more honest and authentic dialogue, which in the first place requires an effort – that of listening and understanding.
In general, I think in such highly conceptual and abstract terms if I think about translation philosophically. But now that it is happening to me? Now that my own words are being subjected to this process?
First of all, it causes a sense of curiosity and enthusiasm. I think that it will be alienating, and as such, interesting and enriching effect to have the meaning of my own written words read by a voice with an intonation that I cannot even understand, and to see them represented by series of letters that I am unable to read.
Next I attempt to consider it in the most concrete form, because even though translation is often the topic of reflection and nuanced theorization, ultimately it remains something very practical, it would seem to me, something almost visceral perhaps: the intimate contact between two voices that get to know each other and identify with each other until they become interwoven, until the translated text is no longer the work of a single author, but of two. This is how I like to think of it, as a sort of ballet with two dancers that must master the rhythm, and must learn to accommodate each other and to each abandon themselves in the other’s arms, at times balking, only to then allowing themselves to get themselves carried away.
And then I think of the moment of translation itself, which will be a glorious occasion, not only to meet another language and another voice, but to look at my own writing through different lenses, from a privileged position. And I think that at times it will be odd, and even difficult, but very often amusing, to see a stranger grappling with words and sentences that are intuitively so much my own.
This process will make me more aware, I am convinced, and most likely lead me to discover hidden quirks within my very own text. For who knows just how much misunderstanding and how many obstacles can emerge during such a project, to what extent the issues and questions that arise can completely transform my opinions on writing?
In short, it will primarily be an encounter, and in this case, you always wonder beforehand: will we truly be able to understand each other? And will we like each other?