I thought I might be able to get away with avoiding the subject in the end, and not have to bore the readers of these lines with my reflections on writing and writers. For lunch today, however, we met with other writers and translators, making it inevitable to address the issue head-on. The complex matter seems to pop up of its own accord, and Helen asks us young writers if we see any merit in a literary community. Chris replies, and as he elaborates on the situation in England, I realize that in Italy, it is an entirely different matter altogether. So it may just be worth devoting a few words to this after all.
In Italy, I help organize a literary festival, and I am often invited to other similar events, which seem to be quite the rage. And yet when it’s all over, even if it was fantastic and all well organized, I’m left with the feeling that it was all for nothing. Instead of engaging in discussion with each other and swapping ideas, the writers survey each other warily, counting how many copies of their books have been sold, how many reviews have been written, and in how many languages they have been translated. All is left is a gathering of writers who spy on each other with envy and suspicion. They pretend that they are part of a literary community, but actually, they only want to get ahead of the rest, to conquer a portion of the market for themselves. That is why I would have answered Helen in the negative: I do not believe in the benefit of a literary network. A writer’s work should take place in private, in solitude, sheltered from the strain of encountering a fabricated community, or faire communauté, as Nancy would call it.
On second thought, however, allow me to take my words back. After a festival such as Crossing Border, I have to change my mind, because here you meet authors of different nationalities, who are actually interested in each other’s ideas and working methods, and are genuinely curious about each other’s work. So I do think that there is need for a literary community, but that it should be as broad as possible in order to be successful, at least of European proportions. This avoids it becoming a ‘family affair’, where everybody keeps tabs on each other, checking out who is there and not, and spreading rumours. Only then, will there truly be the opportunity to exchange thoughts and to have fun.
Now is the time: it is time for what is perhaps a naïve notion, which has been floating through my mind ever since I arrived in the Netherlands. Perhaps you thought you would be able to escape it. I will keep it brief. If young writers attend a festival in Italy, they are viewed in two ways: disdainfully and suspiciously if their book actually does sell, and indifferently if it does not. When it is all over, the young writer goes back home downcast and discouraged, grumbling about the world of literature and publishing, having learned nothing. With events such as Crossing Border, however, the young writer is swept up in all kinds of unexpected things. The translators take the nuances of the writing style and use of language seriously, and the writers can talk with them and compare notes. The other writers are generally curious and interested, and they can share their experiences without reserve; the organization is well prepared and wildly enthusiastic. In this case, the young writers go back home with a ton of new ideas, delighted by the pleasant days spent together and the many things they have done, in the end somewhat less autistic and lonely than before. Probably, at least I would like to believe so, they will even write better than ever.